The Hidden Problem in Grassroots Fundraising (And Why Spreadsheets Don’t Scale)
Spreadsheets don’t fail immediately.
They fail gradually.
At first, everything worked fine. A small group. Simple competition. Several updates every week.
But then things progressed.
When “Good Enough” Stops Being Good Enough
Grassroots football clubs are very clever at finding ways to raise money.
From raffles to events to competitions, people get involved, support the club and create a sense of community.
One of the most popular formats is the “Last Person Standing” game. Players pay to enter and the money is split between the winner and the fundraising team
But behind the scenes, it usually goes like this:
- The spreadsheet keeps track of all the players
- Choice of sending via WhatsApp or SMS
- One person manually checks the results
- Updates are posted manually every week
It worked…until it didn’t.
Scaling Issues
The greater the competition, the harder it is to manage:
- More players = more admins
- More choices = more room for error
- More messages = more confusion
At some point, the organizers become obstacles.
And when that happens:
- Updates slow down
- Mistakes creep in
- Engagement decreases
Hidden Fees
This is the part most people don’t talk about. It’s not just a matter of time, it’s a matter of sustainability.
If running a competition becomes a chore, one of two things will happen:
- The organizers stopped running it
- Or they reduce it
Whatever happens, the club will suffer.
There Must Be a Better Way
Here’s the problem I explored in my previous post:
👉 Why I Built LastPersonStanding.net
The problem is not the idea.
The problem is how it is executed.
Manual processes don’t scale.
And in 2026 – they won’t have to.
Shifting: From Manual to Automatic
What if:
- Choices tracked automatically?
- Results processed instantly?
- Elimination handled without admin?
That’s the shift.
From:
- Manual tracking
- Human congestion
- Dependence on spreadsheets
To:
- Automation
- Scalability
- Better engagement
What Makes This Possible
Once you remove admin, everything changes:
- Competition may develop
- The organizers did not run out of steam
- Players stay engaged longer
And most importantly:
It becomes a reliable way to raise money.
Where This Is Leading
Here’s why I made it:
👉 LastPersonStanding.net
Not to change the game, but to remove the friction around it.
What is next
In the next post, I’ll cover something a little different:
Why I decided to publish it publicly, and what it really means.
PakarPBN
A Private Blog Network (PBN) is a collection of websites that are controlled by a single individual or organization and used primarily to build backlinks to a “money site” in order to influence its ranking in search engines such as Google. The core idea behind a PBN is based on the importance of backlinks in Google’s ranking algorithm. Since Google views backlinks as signals of authority and trust, some website owners attempt to artificially create these signals through a controlled network of sites.
In a typical PBN setup, the owner acquires expired or aged domains that already have existing authority, backlinks, and history. These domains are rebuilt with new content and hosted separately, often using different IP addresses, hosting providers, themes, and ownership details to make them appear unrelated. Within the content published on these sites, links are strategically placed that point to the main website the owner wants to rank higher. By doing this, the owner attempts to pass link equity (also known as “link juice”) from the PBN sites to the target website.
The purpose of a PBN is to give the impression that the target website is naturally earning links from multiple independent sources. If done effectively, this can temporarily improve keyword rankings, increase organic visibility, and drive more traffic from search results.