Monitoring vs Observability: What Business Leaders Need to Know

Monitoring vs Observability: What Business Leaders Need to Know

As an organization grows, common frustrations emerge.

• The dashboard is there.
• Monitoring has been carried out.
• Fire warning.

But leaders still ask:
“Why don’t we see this happening?”

This is where the conversation often leads observation ability. This is a technical sounding term, but the problem is not.

Monitoring feels reassuring – until it isn’t

Most organizations already monitor their systems and reporting.

They track:

• System uptime
• Refresh failure
• Data latency
• Pipeline errors

From a distance everything looks under control.

Until:

• The board pack is challenged
• A number of sudden changes
• Critical metrics drift for no apparent reason

At that point, monitoring notifies you There is something wrong, but not Why.

Monitoring answers “Is something broken?”

Monitoring is about known failure state.

This works well when:

• You know what “good” looks like
• You know what can break
• You know the thresholds to be aware of

Example:

• Was the report refresh successful?
• Has the pipeline failed?
• Is the system up or down?

Monitoring is important, but it is designed to be reactive. This tells you after something crossed the line.

Observability answers “Why did this happen?”

Observability starts from a different place.

This assumes:

• The most important problems are not always predictable
• Business questions change faster than systems
• Failure is often subtle before it is obvious

Observability is about understand behaviornot only detect failures.

For leaders, that means being able to answer:

• Why did this metric change?
• Where does the data come from?
• What else is affected?
• Can we believe this insight today?

This is not a debate about tools

Monitoring vs observability is often framed as a technical improvement.

• New tool.
• New dashboard.
• New telemetry.

That’s not on point.

Observability is not something you have install. It’s something you design for. Without clarity, observability tools will only produce more noise.

Why leaders feel the pain first

As the organization scales:

• Data flow increases
• Dependencies multiply
• Decision-making cycles become shorter

The leader feels the consequences before the team feels the cause.

General symptoms:

• Meetings are spent debating numbers rather than decisions
• Insights that come too late are a problem
• Increased reliance on manual explanations
• “Can someone check his sanity?”

At this stage, the organization does not lack supervision. That’s a lack of understanding.

The hidden disadvantage of poor observation skills

When observability is weak:

• Self-confidence decreases
• The speed of decision making slows down
• Risks increase silently

Leaders start:

• Request more reports
• Ask for more details
• Commission parallel analysis

Ironically, this actually makes the problem worse. More reporting ≠ more insight.

What observation really means for leaders

For business leaders, observability is the ability to:

• Trace the number back to its source
• Understand how metrics are created
• See when assumptions change
• Spot drift before it becomes a failure

Here’s the difference between:

“The number is wrong”

And

“We know exactly why it changed, and what to do next.”

Why don’t platforms automatically give you observability

Modern platforms make observation possible Possible.

They didn’t succeed can’t be avoided.

Without:

• Remove metric ownership
• Agreed definition
• Decision-focused design
• Aligned leadership expectations

Observation tools can uncover existing confusion more quickly. This is why organizations often invest large amounts, but still feel blindsided.

Monitoring tells you when to panic. Observability tells you when to act

Monitoring is about protection.
Observability is about self-confidence.

Both are important, but solve different problems.

Leaders don’t need more warning.
They need fewer surprises.

Why this matters now

As an organization grows, complexity increases faster than understanding.

Here’s why:

• Reporting slows down
• Insights feel harder to extract
• Trust is eroding silently

The problem isn’t that the team isn’t working hard. This is because the organization has moved beyond its original approach to insight.

This is suitable for a series

This article follows:

And leading to the next question leaders often ask:

That’s where we’ll go next.

These are also the challenges faced by organizations Data & Analytics Accelerator usually framed as a tooling problem, but rooted in clarity, ownership, and design.

Better leadership questions

Instead of asking:
“Do we need better monitoring?”

A more useful question would be:
“Do we understand what our data is telling us, and why?”

When leaders can answer them with confidence, the technology finally starts to work For business, not against it.

Useful Links

How to Achieve Key Business Goals with Data-Driven Strategy and AI Tools

What If Rejection Was the First Step to Success?

Lessons from the Fantasy Premier League: Data, Decisions, and Power BI